<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>BPF Syscall on LeonHwang&#39;s Blogs</title>
    <link>https://blog.leonhw.com/tags/bpf-syscall/</link>
    <description>Recent content in BPF Syscall on LeonHwang&#39;s Blogs</description>
    <generator>Hugo 0.125.0-DEV</generator>
    <language>zh</language>
    <copyright>Leon Hwang</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 21:53:33 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.leonhw.com/tags/bpf-syscall/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>eBPF Talk: 震惊！居然有人扩展了 BPF syscall</title>
      <link>https://blog.leonhw.com/post/ebpf-talk-159-extend-bpf-syscall/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 21:53:33 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.leonhw.com/post/ebpf-talk-159-extend-bpf-syscall/</guid>
      <description>那个人是我！！！ 一贯以来，作为面向用户态的内核态接口，syscall 的定义是非常稳定的；变更 syscall 的接口定义是非常罕见的。 在 Alexei 的授意下，我扩展了</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
